AP province when using purchase orders (Canada)

The workflow around purchase orders and Canadian sales taxes is still not working as expected 

In invoices, the tax code override from the vendor works properly, and we can have the taxes calculate. In purchase orders, it reads the tax code and sets the taxability properly but when you pull that invoice into the payable invoice window, it won't calculate taxes at all unless the vendor province matches the tax code (which it often doesn't)

I am also finding that it isn't pulling the department from the job into the subaccount column in purchase orders like it does in AP invoices. I'm wondering how much of this is by design?

Parents
  • Jenna, since purchase orders really are for the vendor, the taxability reads from them, not the job. The tax district also has to match the province since that's how it taxes.  The department is also not going to pull since you would use expenses, and the job has an income account with a department. That part is by design.

  • 0 in reply to CatherineSchmitt

    Its not that the taxability doesn't pull from the vendors, it's that the tax OVERRIDE stops working for purchase orders and we can't calculate GST automatically when a vendor mailing address is in Ontario, for instance, and the purchase is in BC, tax override code is BC, so it works fine from AP, but when we use a PO, we can't automate the GST calculation. 

Reply
  • 0 in reply to CatherineSchmitt

    Its not that the taxability doesn't pull from the vendors, it's that the tax OVERRIDE stops working for purchase orders and we can't calculate GST automatically when a vendor mailing address is in Ontario, for instance, and the purchase is in BC, tax override code is BC, so it works fine from AP, but when we use a PO, we can't automate the GST calculation. 

Children
No Data