Purchase Invoice billable quantity should be "A" status

Hello Everyone,

I want to create a purchase invoice for the receipts which are having only "A" status.

For Q and R status receipts system should not allow us to create an Invoice.

Just for your reference, I had done the following setups:-

Parameter values--> Purchase-->Invoice billable Quantity (parameter set to A)

But still, it is not working.

I would appreciate if anyone could help.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Murugan

  • Hello Murgan,

    When you set the invoicing rules parameter PIHQTYAQR to bill only 'A' status quantity, the purchase invoice will not select the Q or R status stock lines. On the other hand user can modify the quantity on the invoice line. There are no blocking messages when the quantity is modified manually. For example, I have a PO for 125 Qty, and I receive in the PO in 'Q' status. In Quality control process I split the total quantity into 2 lines, 25 in 'A' and 100 in 'R' status. At the time of invoice line preloading from the receipts, only those quantities received with status A will be submitted. i.e. based on the parameter setup, proposed quantity is 25. Please check with the user.  

    Thank you.

  • in reply to Joel Singam

    Hello Joel, 

    I have set PIHQTYAQR to "Qty A" only. 
    If Purchase Receipt Qty is in Q status, then I want to restrict manual qty modification in Purchase Invoice against that Purchase Receipt.
    E.g. I have a Purchase receipt with 100 Qty, full Qty in Q status, but when I am creating a Purchase Invoice, it is letting me select that Purchase Receipt and modify the Invoice Qty. I want to restrict it. Is it possible?

  • in reply to R G

    Hello RG,

    Yes, it's not a hard stop. It will let you pick the receipt from the left list, but the quantity on the invoiced line will be zero (according to your example). You could assign an access code on the quantity field and it will prevent any changes to the invoiced quantity. This will prevent all changes to the quantity for restricted user.

  • in reply to Joel Singam

    Thank you for the suggestion Joel.

    I will give a try and see.