Return of Goods (Average Cost Valuation)

I am struggling with how Sage 100 is handling a Return of Goods for "Average Cost" valuation items.  When the return is processed, Sage is using the average cost of the item rather than the cost used in the original incorrect receipt.  For example, if I have a SKU with 100 units on hand and a per unit cost of $1.00 each and then I receive another 100 units but I mistakenly make the cost $0.10 per unit, I have a situation where I have 200 units on hand at a total value of $110 or $0.55 each.  When I go to reverse the incorrect receipt using Return of Goods Sage uses the cost of $0.55 per unit rather than the $0.10 cost per unit.  This makes it impossible to get the inventory balance back to the $1.00 per unit.  I can see that in the General Ledger postings that Sage is hitting the PO Variance account which will go against Cost of Sales, but my concern is that this is an income statement fix and does not change the fact that your inventory is misstated on the balance sheet.

What is the best way to handle an incorrect receipt of good to fix the value of your inventory and make sure that the vendor invoice matches.

Is this something others struggle with and how do you handle this?

Thanks,

Parents
  • 0

    FIFO/LIFO items have this problem too.  The ability to choose cost tier / set unit cost (or pulling values from the PO / a receipt on that PO), when processing a return seems like a feature which should have been built into the program long ago.

    When I see this I recommend doing the return and re-receipt, so the PO / invoice side looks good.  IA to correct inventory values.  Journal entries to move the extraneous posted amounts to the correct accounts (inventory control / adjustment, purchases clearing / variance...).

    I'm interested if anyone has a better suggestion.

  • 0 in reply to Kevin M

    Kevin, 

    Thanks for the input!  I was afraid your answer was going to be suggested solution.  It just seems to be a really long, arduous, inefficient, (insert multiple other nasty adjectives) process to deal with something that is going to happen somewhat frequently.  We process about 2,500 receipt of goods per month so even if we only get 5% of them wrong, we are still going to have about 5 or 6 per day that need to be fixed and that ends up to a lot of work.  I will follow the recommended steps for now, but it seems like alot of this could be avoided if Sage would allow you to control the cost used during Return of Goods.  Our controller is maintains that Sage's way of using the income statement (purchase variance which goes to GOCGS) to balance the transaction rather than fixing the balance sheet account (inventory) is not correct.  Maybe I can drop him off at Sage HQ to argue the finer points of GAAP with them Slight smile

    Thanks again for your answer!  Much appreciated!  I will monitor for a while longer to see if anyone comes up with a different suggestion. If not, I will mark your answer as the Verified one.

    Thanks,

  • 0 in reply to Tyler Christensen

    Yeah, Sage 100 really needs a process to truly just reverse a receipt of goods.  You have a similar issue with landed costs, if you use those.  Return of Goods doesn't allow entry of landed costs, which has a similar effect to what you described.  I've been saying this for years.  I'm not sure what tool Sage uses this week to track ideas and suggestions (that they'll generally ignore anyway) but I put this one out there about 6 or 7 years ago...

    https://www5.v1ideas.com/TheSageGroupplc/Sage100ERP/Idea/Detail/11291  

Reply Children
No Data